Can We Vote Our Way Out Of Civilisational Collapse?

One of the greatest questions of our time is whether democracy provides the means to resolve our current dilemma. It is not the only question though, another might be: even if we could, will we then be able to peacefully prevent the extinction of Britain as we have known it for over a thousand years?

Technically speaking, we could of course vote our way out of it. A new or existing political party simply has to outline the problems and offer credible solutions to them. In practical terms though, this is already impossible. A party attempting to do such a thing would be curtailed by the European Court of Human Rights, and a new party would be immediately liquidated by the highly politicised Electoral Commission.

We only have to look at the AfD in Germany where there is genuine discussion about labelling it as a terrorist organisation; Marine Le Pen in France and the chilling example of Romania where the genuinely tyrannical EU was accused of annulling an election based on the winning party’s purported “far-right” ideology. The message sent to us is essentially: “Yes, you live in a democracy, but if you don’t share the values and ideology of the European elite, then undemocratic means will be found to smithereen you into oblivion.”

In normal times, this would be an astonishingly bad situation; in our present time it is far more threatening. What, after all, is the very worse future scenario Britain and Western Europe could face? Answer, an Islamic governed Germany, France, Britain, Holland, Italy etc - a 2050 (or earlier) dystopia enabled by the brutal crushing of all dissent from 2029 onwards via a digital tyranny – including government controlled digital bank accounts - capable of bankrupting and making homeless each and every dissident.

One could close here. The above pretty much answers the core issues in regards to voting our way out of this. But let us address the probable political future of Britain, which will also answer the question of peacefully halting our civilisational collapse.

Nigel Farage’s Reform Party could very well win the 2029 General Election, assuming the entire country is not ablaze and under Starmer martial law at that point. Reform then has five years to save Britain, which takes us to 2034, at which juncture there will be several million more muslims living in Britain and – in all probability – several million fewer British who, not unnaturally, decided a vastly better life was available elsewhere.

If one assumes Farage becomes Prime Minister in 2029, what might he do to save us? He could overturn the planned - or already in operation - digital Control matrix, which would be jolly good, but what will he do about ye olde thorny issue of Islam? Not very much one imagines, unless he is a much braver and tactically consummate politician than one should give him credit for.

The Islamic threat is real in terms of taking political control. As a demographic, Islam is growing faster than any other via high birth rates and continued immigration, whilst the British demographic is near-halving every new generation – without taking into account an ever-increasing exodus of Brits who are finally reading the writing on the wall.

Starmer’s Labour Party won the last election with fewer than 10 million votes. Islam could number that within a decade and could become 20 million by 2050. And let us not assume the true number already here is accurate. The census is not the friend of illegals after all, and there exist millions more National Insurance numbers than the claimed number of people in Britain. It is quite possible 10 million+ Muslims are here today, which would align with supermarket data suggesting exactly this.

In terms of winning a General Election post 2035, an Islamic party could genuinely do so. They would need just one political party and a 100% turnout / bloc-vote whipped by imams during Friday prayer. Bear in mind the unified potential of this compared to say a 60% turnout of natives all voting for three or four different parties. An Islamic government is a long-term inevitability, but it could happen much sooner than expected – as huge events throughout history so often tend to do.

Farage could win the next election but will do nothing to stop a future Islamic government coming to power. Suppose Rupert Lowe joined Ben Habib’s Advance UK Party and became PM? What might he do to become Britain’s saviour? In point of fact, what MUST any potential saviour actually do to warrant such a soubriquet?

The answer is not particularly pleasant, but it is far more moral, just, natural and honourable than betraying our children and grandchildren to life in a future Anglostan - and it is this: Islam should be treated in Britain as Christianity is treated in Saudi Arabia; no mosques, no public displays of faith and no representation in our political apparatus. In addition, welfare should be withdrawn from all foreigners regardless of their length of time in Britain. Financial incentives should also be on the table. In short, all peaceful means of removing Islam from Britain must be considered.

Too extreme? One can hardly think so. There is nothing extreme about politely requiring foreign Muslims to move to a native Muslim country. Especially so when if we do NOT do this Britain can only and inevitably become an Islamic State. It is not pleasant, I agree, but it is considerably more unpleasant to do nothing and thus subject young British people to an enslaved life under Sharia.

Could such a “treat Islam as Saudi treats Christianity” course of action be carried out peacefully? One cannot think so. Its demography would take to the streets. Atrocities would be committed. Reprisals would take place. A tit-for-tat increasingly violent scenario would rapidly ensue before spiralling out of control and into a religious civil war, which in all probability would suck in Germany, France and Turkey, along with its powerful military.

At that point, what would Pakistan do? What would Qatar and Saudi do? Turn off the gas/oil spigots? Would we then have to invade the middle east? What would Russia then do and what would America then do? Events, dear boy, events, and all that. But we cannot do nothing, because doing nothing means an Islamic Britain. It is at moments like these I find myself hearing the prescient words of A. E. Houseman on the eve of WWI:

Europe is a powder keg. The Germans are gripped by fervent nationalism, the British feel afraid of German expansion….the French still remember the bitter defeat of 1870. Germany enters into a pact with the Austro-Hungarian Empire, but that empire is being torn apart by ethnic tensions and it will take just one spark to ignite a European war on an unimaginable scale.

Would a Prime Minister Lowe be prepared to do what must be done, AND be prepared for what would surely follow? One rather doubts it. He might tinker around the edges, deport a million illegals here and a few thousand foreign criminals there, but not much more than that, and who can realistically blame him? No one wants to start WWIII, which is pretty much guaranteed if we took the necessary action to live as our ancestors lived for over a thousand years. This is simply the reality of where we are now, after decades of political betrayal and cowardice.

Left-liberals will denounce this as the ravings of an XYZ-ist, but even they must be feeling the growing waves of seething anger across the country as the simmering pressure cooker comes to the boil and the not terribly heavy valve atop starts to buck furiously. In 2007 this author predicted a religious civil war in Europe circa 2025. It must be presumed we are all much more aware of this now, than when it was first penned.

In order to understand what is eminently possible, read Alastair Finlan’s book, The Collapse of Yugoslavia 1991-1999, which details the civil war responsible for killing 140,000 people, the majority of whom were civilians, out of a population of only 10 million. One chilling quote in particular is as follows:

In 1991, almost overnight, an ethnically diverse region that had enjoyed decades of peaceful coexistence descended into bitter hatred and chaos. Communities fractured along lines of ethnic/religious affiliation and the resulting fighting was deeply personal, resulting in brutality, rape, torture, genocide and ethnic cleansing.

On which sombre note one must finally answer the questions posed at the beginning. No, we cannot vote our way out of this, and even if we could it is now utterly impossible to peacefully halt our civilisational collapse. No credible politician with a genuine chance of attaining power currently exists, and no such political party would be allowed to attain power anyway courtesy of the ECHR / EU and, quite probably, the remains of the British military commanded by King Charles III.

One has to appreciate the arguments for fighting this via peaceful disobedience, along with the application of current/historical constitutional legislation. Protests, strikes etc should also be included, and all of these must be urgently attempted. Deep down though, one harbours the notion only brave and sturdy Kentish Yeomen can offer Britain her required salvation.