Our World Is Not Compatible With Desert Religion
Our peaceful people make no apology for hostility to alien customs from half a planet away. Our colours are raised in opposition to politicians who sponsor an ideology which champions violence against women and theocracy which threatens freedom won by our forefathers in blood.
Rayner, Cooper, Starmer, Corbyn, Galloway, and Drakeford have built entire careers on their blind defence of minority religions, leaping to shield their dogma whenever anyone dares question them. Democracy, in their eyes, is not the rule of the majority, but the tyranny of the client minority.
This is a hangover and byproduct side-effect of Soviet malice, which deliberately sought to invert Western liberal democracy through vanguardism and theorised "revolutionary energy" of minority client groups.
Islam is referred to as “a religion of peace,” separated as a loving Yoga mat-esoteric idea from its Blairite militant cousin, Islamism. Strip away the multiculturalist PR and you find something else entirely: a political desert code of conquest, with laws and punishments utterly at odds with the freedoms we inherited in Britain from those who died for them.
Mugged By Reality
Everywhere we look, we are forced to tolerate multiculturalism's useful idiots: politicians, professors, journalists, church leaders. Some knowingly silence debate; others do it from cowardice or a warped “sensitivity” we started calling political "correctness" in the late 1980s. Even our lawmakers demand blasphemy-style protections under fictional social science pathologies like “Islamophobia”: technocratic original sin designed not to protect people from violence, but to shield foreign doctrine from scrutiny. Their secular equality religion demands adherence to the blasphemy of other faiths.
The parlour trick is always the same: critics are accused of “attacking” provocateurs. It’s a diversion: an individual is not the issue; the contents of their collective political doctrines are. An ideology can be judged on its merits, without hatred for its individual followers who frequently dissent. For every individual who denounced 9/11, a thousand in Pakistan cheered injury to the Great Satan.
Just as reading Das Kapital revealed communism’s reality, anyone who reads the Quran, and Hadiths in plain English can identify Islam’s political designs for themselves without a condescending lecture from upper-middle class residents of Islington and Brighton.
Your Votes, Our Lives
We are watching a troubling double standard in law enforcement. Robust policing of mosque protests, while “hurtie words” land Lucy Connolly in prison and a man in Cumbria is arrested for saying he “loves bacon,” contrasts starkly with the non-arrest of protesters told merely to “leave their weapons at the mosque.” The perception is undeniable: the law is applied selectively to protect minority extremists from offence while hammering their critics for the sake of "public order."
In 2024, Labour lost seats to pro-Palestinian independents and saw majorities collapse elsewhere. Wes Streeting barely clung on in Ilford North. Critics now say up to 50 Labour seats are shaped by Islamic voting blocs — a reality Starmer cannot ignore.
U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance warned NATO risked gaining its first “Islamic nuclear state” under Labour (sadly sidelined by ignoring the status of Pakistan as a nuclear power). His language was condemned, but the fact it was said at all shows how the state of politics in Britain is perceived.
Apologists For Desert Stalinism
By making every criticism about individual Muslims rather than the scriptures of Islam, debate is deliberately stifled. Imagine being told, in the 1930s, not to judge the idealist paradise of communism for fear of offending Stalinists. The absurdity speaks for itself.
The Arab religion is not a race. It is not just a personal faith in a mystical yoga-deity you can find on a trip to Bali after a breakup. It is a political system which:
- Places men over women
- Demands non-believers accept second-class status
- Sanctions slavery and violent jihad
- Seeks to dominate every society it enters
That is not a private esoteric religious movement — it is a totalitarian dystopia which seeks political leadership and domination, the kind women of Iran are still experiencing right now.
Wales Is Peaceful
Britain, and Wales in particular, has no duty to distort its historic freedoms to accommodate a political system imported from half-way across the world by its own multicultural fanatics. If one wants to live under Sharia, there are countries where one can do so happily. Britain is not one of them, has never been one, and must never become one.
Our ancient freedoms, won through the blood of teenage soldiers at Normandy, and Islam as a political force, cannot coexist. Pretending otherwise is national self-harm.
This is not about “hurt feelings.” It concerns whether our grandchildren inherit freedom or the "submission" to the aggression of aliens. Islam has enslaved millions, destroyed civilisations, and declared war on all it cannot control. An inconvenient statement which is historical fact, not rhetoric or opinion.
It may not be every Muslim, but it's an awful lot of them, isn't it?
Does a sunny day in December mean it's not winter?
Our political class want us to adopt the storyline this is about compassion, to deify themselves in martyrdom. In truth, it’s about shielding those they hope will elevate them as footstools— and in doing so, jeopardising national security and risking what we have always known as civilisation.
The Arab desert religion, as a political doctrine, has no place in the Britannic Isles, thousands of miles from its home. Not now. Not ever.
